Post #2 The Objective Historical Truth

In our readings from Holinshed's Chronicles, I found myself captivated by the intrigue and drama of Elizabeth's accession to the throne. This made for an interesting consideration of what is considered to be the "multivocal view of British history." The best explanation for my interest came from the concept of melding many different genres which helped to "augment the narrative." We debated the concept of objective historical truth in class, but the concept of the "story" is crucial to helping modern readers "perceive and comprehend the past." The practice of empowering the reader to consider and debate the deeper meaning of these historical events represents the writers' efforts at objectivity. However, as Dr. Mc noted in her article, these methods are never truly impartial. I believe that the use of different genres has the effect of directing the reader to read and illustrate these events so they have a deeper understanding. Regardless of their arms for objectivity, the writers of the Chronicles hoped to glorify British history and its rulers, and they did so quite effectively. Thus the facts of the Chronicles are verifiable--Mary's suspicions and maltreatment of Elizabeth, Mary's death, Elizabeth's ascension--however the writers provide a dramatized version to engage their readers.